IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Sitzman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-10-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Connecticut Jr. Rangers USPHL-Premier-Classic 16 1 6 7 0.438 0.1314 0.1417 0.3604 0.3888
2017-18 — NCDC 44 7 8 15 0.341 0.0961 0.0976 0.2760 0.2802
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC SR 21 7 9 16 0.762
2020-21 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC JR 6 2 4 6 1.000
2019-20 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC SO 25 17 19 36 1.440
2018-19 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC FR 23 7 12 19 0.826
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.83
2018-19 · Anna Maria
+737.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
82%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#34710
Forward overall
#1518
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Conor Lemirande
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Miami (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average
NCAAe PPG
Erik Baskin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Air Force (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Austin Ziakas
Saint Mary's · 2013-14
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Brian Elser
Manhattanville · 2008-09
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Thomas Schwartz
Saint Anselm · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.