← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ethan McLaughlin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-08-14 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Penticton Vees BCHL 1 0 1 1 1.000 0.3853 0.4201 1.4571 1.5886
2018-19 BCHL 51 0 7 7 0.137 0.0529 0.0548 0.2001 0.2074
2019-20 Drayton Valley Thunder AJHL 21 0 4 4 0.191 0.0639 0.0639 0.1766 0.1766
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Adrian ACHA_D1 35 5 23 28 0.800
2024-25 Adrian ACHA_D1 35 5 23 28 0.800
2023-24 Adrian ACHA_D1 35 5 23 28 0.800
2022-23 Adrian ACHA_D1 35 5 23 28 0.800
2021-22 Adrian ACHA_D1 35 5 23 28 0.800
2020-21 Adrian ACHA_D1 35 5 23 28 0.800
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.80
2020-21 · Adrian
+321.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
88%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24412
Defenseman overall
#3431
Defenseman born in 2000
#3183
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Boston · 2009-10
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2018-19
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.