← New Search ↗ Social Card

Juliano Santalucia Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-09-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 45 1 5 6 0.133 0.0447 0.0506 0.1235 0.1399
2018-19 Coquitlam Express BCHL 51 1 6 7 0.137 0.0529 0.0576 0.2001 0.2179
2019-20 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 40 3 9 12 0.300 0.1006 0.1006 0.2780 0.2780
2020-21 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 15 0 5 5 0.333 0.1118 0.1118 0.3089 0.3089
2021-22 AJHL 56 2 11 13 0.232 0.0778 0.0730 0.2151 0.2018
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Aurora D3 NCHA SR 32 6 13 19 0.594
2024-25 Aurora D3 NCHA JR 30 10 22 32 1.067
2023-24 Aurora D3 NCHA SO 28 4 12 16 0.571
2022-23 Aurora D3 NCHA FR 27 3 7 10 0.370
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2022-23 · Aurora
+487.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18190
Defenseman overall
#2860
Defenseman born in 2001
#2015
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Plymouth State · 2015-16
0.471 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2015-16
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2013-14
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.