IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Buhr Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-07-07 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 — BCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2019-20 — BCHL 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.1284 0.1284 0.4851 0.4851
2020-21 — BCHL 20 15 13 28 1.400 0.5394 0.5394 2.0374 2.0374
2021-22 — BCHL 46 22 25 47 1.022 0.3937 0.3860 1.4869 1.4578
2022-23 — BCHL 21 12 6 18 0.857 0.3302 0.3076 1.2473 1.1618
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Union D1 ECAC SR 35 19 17 36 1.029
2024-25 Union D1 ECAC SR 36 19 9 28 0.778
2023-24 Union D1 ECAC JR 35 11 13 24 0.686
2022-23 Clarkson D1 ECAC — 10 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aaron Herdt
Concordia · 2015-16
1.273 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brady Fleurent
University of New England · 2014-15
1.074 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Braydon Beahm
St. Norbert · 2024-25
0.968 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.