IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cade Alami Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-03-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Berkshire School NE-Prep 11 0 1 1 0.091 0.0180 0.0180 0.0414 0.0414
2019-20 Surrey Eagles BCHL 58 4 9 13 0.224 0.0863 0.0863 0.3261 0.3261
2020-21 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 16 1 4 5 0.312 0.1274 0.1274 0.2512 0.2512
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Minnesota D1 BigTen — 6 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Arizona State D1 NCHC — 14 0 2 2 0.143
2022-23 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 29 0 3 3 0.103
2021-22 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 10 0 1 1 0.100
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.02
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2021-22 · Boston College
+488.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
95%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14307
Defenseman overall
#2435
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Lukas Buchta
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy Mazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nolan Zweep
Western New England · 2015-16
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Zak Albers
Bethel · 2016-17
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Hart
Fredonia · 2000-01
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.