← New Search ↗ Social Card

Austin Burnevik Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-01-03 Country: USA
2024 NHL Draft Round 6, Pick #182  ·  Anaheim Ducks Anaheim Ducks
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Totino-Grace USHS-MN 27 15 13 28 1.037 0.2792 0.2792 0.2519 0.2519
2020-21 Totino-Grace USHS-MN 20 18 23 41 2.050 0.5519 0.5519 0.4979 0.4979
2021-22 NTDP-U18 52 9 15 24 0.462 0.3578 0.3620 1.7177 1.7379
2022-23 NTDP-U18 61 12 15 27 0.443 0.3432 0.3292 1.6473 1.5799
2023-24 Madison Capitols USHL 61 40 31 71 1.164 0.7154 0.7041 3.4291 3.3751
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC SO 36 20 18 38 1.056
2024-25 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC 35 13 15 28 0.800
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.52
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.80
2024-25 · St. Cloud State
+55.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

90%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5858
Forward overall
#190
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 1.11 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.80 D1 FR PPG)
0.68 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.09 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.67 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.39 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.84 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Marian (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UMass
0.61 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.