IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Stefano Bottini Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-05-03 Country: Switzerland
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Penticton Vees BCHL 17 4 4 8 0.471 0.1813 0.1813 0.6849 0.6849
2021-22 Penticton Vees BCHL 51 11 17 28 0.549 0.2115 0.2055 0.7990 0.7763
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Canisius D1 AHA SR 32 4 4 8 0.250
2024-25 Canisius D1 AHA JR 33 3 1 4 0.121
2023-24 Canisius D1 AHA SO 23 4 6 10 0.435
2022-23 Canisius D1 AHA FR 32 4 4 8 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2022-23 · Canisius
+42.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29574
Forward overall
#1724
Forward born in 2002
#1625
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Davis
Neumann · 2012-13
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Nault
St. Thomas · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Pat Power
Wisconsin-Superior · 2003-04
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.