IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Christian Kim Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-02-23 Country: USA
Air Force
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Wenatchee Wild BCHL 50 10 18 28 0.560 0.2158 0.2294 0.8150 0.8665
2023-24 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 51 10 17 27 0.529 0.2040 0.2075 0.7704 0.7837
2024-25 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 54 21 37 58 1.074 0.4139 0.4002 1.5631 1.5116
2025-26 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 52 18 42 60 1.154 0.4446 0.4136 1.6791 1.5620
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11039
Forward overall
#500
Forward born in 2005
#335
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Mingoia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Air Force Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Oli Genest
NAHL 2024-25
0.29
actual FR PPG at Air Force
Nathan Horn
NAHL 2019-20
0.50
actual FR PPG at Air Force
Nick Sajevic
NAHL 2023-24
0.35
actual FR PPG at Air Force
Evan Giesler
NAHL 2014-15
0.28
actual FR PPG at Air Force

D2/3 Comparables

Peter Magagna
SUNY Oswego · 2004-05
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Conlan Keenan
SUNY Geneseo · 2015-16
1.296 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Scanlon
UMass Dartmouth · 2023-24
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.