IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Evan Giesler Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-02-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 35 7 10 17 0.486 0.1784 0.1831 0.5127 0.5262
2013-14 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 60 16 26 42 0.700 0.2572 0.2511 0.7389 0.7212
2014-15 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 59 28 28 56 0.949 0.3487 0.3221 1.0019 0.9255
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Air Force D1 AHA SR 36 7 13 20 0.556
2017-18 Air Force D1 AHA JR 42 12 11 23 0.548
2016-17 Air Force D1 AHA SO 42 11 18 29 0.691
2015-16 Air Force D1 AHA FR 36 4 6 10 0.278
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2015-16 · Air Force
+10.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15371
Forward overall
#628
Forward born in 1994
#750
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Eric Bolden
Elmira · 2016-17
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Travis Broughman
SUNY Oswego · 2017-18
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Reid Bibb
Buffalo State · 2016-17
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.