← New Search ↗ Social Card

Landon Mackie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-06-11 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Stonehill
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 5 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 42 2 3 5 0.119 0.0459 0.0497 0.1732 0.1874
2024-25 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 54 17 17 34 0.630 0.2426 0.2503 0.9163 0.9454
2025-26 BCHL 53 25 29 54 1.019 0.3926 0.3906 1.4828 1.4754
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20603
Forward overall
#915
Forward born in 2006
#993
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.36 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Stonehill Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NAHL 2024-25
0.06
actual FR PPG at Stonehill
EHL 2021-22
0.57
actual FR PPG at Stonehill
NCDC 2020-21
1.76
actual FR PPG at Stonehill
SM-Liiga-Jr 2022-23
0.30
actual FR PPG at Stonehill

D2/3 Comparables

Trinity · 2016-17
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Worcester State · 2023-24
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2014-15
0.955 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.