← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Harvey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-03-15 Country: Canada
Dartmouth
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 51 9 24 33 0.647 0.1586 0.1681 0.4455 0.4722
2023-24 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 38 5 21 26 0.684 0.1677 0.1690 0.4711 0.4749
2024-25 BCHL 45 2 14 16 0.356 0.1370 0.1329 0.5175 0.5019
2025-26 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 48 12 20 32 0.667 0.2569 0.2397 0.9702 0.9052
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7474
Defenseman overall
#1765
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Dartmouth Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NAHL 2012-13
0.34
actual FR PPG at Dartmouth
NCDC 2017-18
0.16
actual FR PPG at Dartmouth
AJHL 2021-22
0.14
actual FR PPG at Dartmouth
USPHL-Premier-Classic 2015-16
0.21
actual FR PPG at Dartmouth

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2017-18
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Framingham State · 2016-17
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.