← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brec Christenson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-09-06 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Minnesota State
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 AJHL 4 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 20 5 4 9 0.450 0.1509 0.1568 0.4164 0.4326
2025-26 Sherwood Park Crusaders BCHL 13 2 2 4 0.308 0.1186 0.1194 0.4478 0.4509
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#47341
Forward overall
#2991
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Minnesota State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2020-21
0.25
actual FR PPG at Minnesota State
USHL 2015-16
0.21
actual FR PPG at Minnesota State
USHL 2013-14
0.11
actual FR PPG at Minnesota State
BCHL 2014-15
0.10
actual FR PPG at Minnesota State

D2/3 Comparables

Marian · 2015-16
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
New England College · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wesleyan · 2015-16
0.765 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.