← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joey Melo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-06-21 Country: Canada
Alaska Anchorage
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 South Shore Kings NCDC 50 9 10 19 0.380 0.1549 0.1711 0.3054 0.3373
2023-24 Whitecourt Wolverines AJHL 56 22 21 43 0.768 0.2576 0.2657 0.7106 0.7329
2024-25 Blackfalds Bulldogs BCHL 42 17 22 39 0.929 0.3578 0.3518 1.3514 1.3287
2025-26 Blackfalds Bulldogs BCHL 53 18 33 51 0.962 0.3708 0.3509 1.4004 1.3254
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13525
Forward overall
#667
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Alaska Anchorage Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NAHL 2023-24
0.74
actual FR PPG at Alaska Anchorage
NAHL 2017-18
0.21
actual FR PPG at Alaska Anchorage
NAHL 2018-19
0.32
actual FR PPG at Alaska Anchorage
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.09
actual FR PPG at Alaska Anchorage

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2000-01
0.920 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Michael's College · 2003-04
1.280 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2006-07
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.