← New Search ↗ Social Card

Spencer Rheaume Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-11-02 Country: Canada
RIT
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Whitecourt Wolverines AJHL 4 1 1 2 0.500 0.1677 0.1923 0.4627 0.5305
2022-23 Whitecourt Wolverines AJHL 53 7 28 35 0.660 0.2215 0.2430 0.6111 0.6703
2023-24 Whitecourt Wolverines AJHL 56 14 18 32 0.571 0.1916 0.2011 0.5288 0.5551
2024-25 Okotoks Oilers BCHL 52 9 14 23 0.442 0.1704 0.1707 0.6437 0.6447
2025-26 Spruce Grove Saints BCHL 54 6 13 19 0.352 0.1356 0.1308 0.5121 0.4941
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#35943
Forward overall
#2208
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

RIT Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2019-20
0.47
actual FR PPG at RIT
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.50
actual FR PPG at RIT
OHL 2023-24
0.69
actual FR PPG at RIT
AJHL 2014-15
0.62
actual FR PPG at RIT

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2017-18
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2011-12
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.