← New Search ↗ Social Card

Coy Pighin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-01-10 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Colorado College
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 40 12 21 33 0.825 0.2767 0.3061 0.7635 0.8447
2023-24 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 46 14 20 34 0.739 0.2479 0.2626 0.6840 0.7245
2024-25 Okotoks Oilers BCHL 50 6 15 21 0.420 0.1618 0.1636 0.6112 0.6179
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26739
Forward overall
#1326
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Colorado College Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Colorado College
USHL 2014-15
0.15
actual FR PPG at Colorado College
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.27
actual FR PPG at Colorado College
NAHL 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at Colorado College

D2/3 Comparables

Framingham State · 2018-19
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2008-09
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Olaf · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.