← New Search ↗ Social Card

Davids Livsics Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-02-19 Country: Latvia
Alaska Fairbanks
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 RoKi U20 SM-Liiga-Jr 21 4 11 15 0.714 0.3872 0.3759 1.0802 1.0487
2025-26 Vernon Vipers BCHL 52 11 16 27 0.519 0.2000 0.1859 0.7556 0.7025
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18421
Forward overall
#984
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Alaska Fairbanks Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

AJHL 2023-24
0.00
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.89
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.40
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
WHL 2024-25
0.44
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2016-17
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2004-05
0.516 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2011-12
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.