← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dante Siciliano Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-09-26 Country: Canada
Maine
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Wisconsin Rapids Riverkings USPHL-Premier 44 8 17 25 0.568 0.0743 0.0856 0.1928 0.2221
2022-23 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 47 4 5 9 0.192 0.0781 0.0873 0.1539 0.1720
2023-24 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 49 10 15 25 0.510 0.1711 0.1787 0.4721 0.4932
2024-25 Brooks Bandits BCHL 39 2 12 14 0.359 0.1383 0.1378 0.5225 0.5207
2025-26 Brooks Bandits BCHL 38 5 19 24 0.632 0.2434 0.2336 0.9192 0.8821
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7602
Defenseman overall
#1783
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Maine Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NAHL 2023-24
0.00
actual FR PPG at Maine
BCHL 2021-22
0.29
actual FR PPG at Maine
CCHL 2014-15
0.24
actual FR PPG at Maine
NAHL 2018-19
0.17
actual FR PPG at Maine

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2006-07
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2005-06
1.033 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Connecticut College · 2011-12
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.