IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Maxime Ly Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-07-05 Country: Canada
Union
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Sherwood Park Crusaders BCHL 45 2 10 12 0.267 0.1028 0.1115 0.3879 0.4209
2025-26 Sherwood Park Crusaders BCHL 51 9 19 28 0.549 0.2115 0.2217 0.7985 0.8370
2026-27 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 5 1 1 2 0.400 0.1541 0.1541 0.5818 0.5818
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#35308
Forward overall
#1392
Forward born in 2007
#2033
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG

Union Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Andrew Seaman
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.22
actual FR PPG at Union
Gavin Garry
USHS-MN 2023-24
0.00
actual FR PPG at Union
Luke Garry
USHS-MN 2023-24
0.00
actual FR PPG at Union
Lefty Markonidis
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at Union

D2/3 Comparables

Jordan Gray
Connecticut College · 2006-07
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cam Perez
New England College · 2021-22
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Stevens
Southern Maine · 2004-05
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.