IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Maxime Ly Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-07-05 Country: Canada
Union
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Sherwood Park Crusaders BCHL 45 2 10 12 0.267 0.1028 0.1115 0.3881 0.4211
2025-26 Sherwood Park Crusaders BCHL 51 9 19 28 0.549 0.2115 0.2217 0.7990 0.8376
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#34883
Forward overall
#1335
Forward born in 2007
#1964
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Nate Arentz
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Adam Johnson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
Max Shuart
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Michigan
0.25 No data
NCAAe PPG
Alex Rauter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Cornell (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Nikolas Olsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Boston University (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average
NCAAe PPG

Union Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Chaz Smedsrud
SJHL 2016-17
0.30
actual FR PPG at Union
Bram Scheerer
NAHL 2017-18
0.00
actual FR PPG at Union
Michael Hodge
BCHL 2018-19
0.29
actual FR PPG at Union
Andrew Seaman
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.22
actual FR PPG at Union

D2/3 Comparables

Mac Lowry
Stevenson · 2017-18
1.062 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lee Swallow
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2002-03
1.214 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Barkley
Neumann · 2021-22
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.