← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lefty Markonidis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-04-29 Country: USA
Union
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 BB&N NE-Prep 21 0 1 1 0.048 0.0094 0.0094 0.0217 0.0217
2021-22 BB&N NE-Prep 23 14 9 23 1.000 0.1981 0.1981 0.4556 0.4556
2022-23 Avon Old Farms NE-Prep 28 7 8 15 0.536 0.1061 0.1061 0.2441 0.2441
2023-24 Avon Old Farms NE-Prep 27 14 14 28 1.037 0.2054 0.2054 0.4725 0.4725
2024-25 Lincoln Stars USHL 59 20 11 31 0.525 0.3099 0.2941 1.5780 1.4977
2025-26 Lincoln Stars USHL 59 17 15 32 0.542 0.3200 0.2883 1.6290 1.4675
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14190
Forward overall
#703
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

Union Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NAHL 2023-24
0.30
actual FR PPG at Union
NAHL 2021-22
0.17
actual FR PPG at Union
BCHL 2019-20
0.21
actual FR PPG at Union
BCHL 2020-21
0.22
actual FR PPG at Union

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2009-10
1.071 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2009-10
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Post · 2021-22
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.