IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Max Hense Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-03-01 Country: Germany
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
St. Lawrence
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 21 1 3 4 0.191 0.0734 0.0747 0.2772 0.2821
2025-26 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 50 2 13 15 0.300 0.1156 0.1134 0.4366 0.4283
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17947
Defenseman overall
#3060
Defenseman born in 2006
#2724
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

St. Lawrence Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Teddy Mallgrave
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
Sam Hall
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.08
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
Evan Orloff
NAHL 2022-23
0.10
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
Cameron White
CCHL 2016-17
0.11
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence

D2/3 Comparables

Thomas Sansone
Johnson & Wales · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Evan Hesse
Augsburg · 2012-13
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Troy Bubanic
Hamline · 2010-11
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.