← New Search ↗ Social Card

Levi Eiter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-04-25 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Bentley
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Prior Lake USHS-MN 30 5 9 14 0.467 0.0591 0.0591 0.1134 0.1134
2022-23 Prior Lake USHS-MN 26 5 12 17 0.654 0.0828 0.0828 0.1588 0.1588
2023-24 Prior Lake USHS-MN 26 16 8 24 0.923 0.1169 0.1169 0.2242 0.2242
2024-25 Prior Lake USHS-MN 26 21 17 38 1.462 0.1850 0.1850 0.3550 0.3550
2025-26 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 53 9 22 31 0.585 0.2254 0.2228 0.8512 0.8415
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17953
Forward overall
#754
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Bentley Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

BCHL 2023-24
0.45
actual FR PPG at Bentley
NAHL 2014-15
0.34
actual FR PPG at Bentley
USHL 2013-14
0.39
actual FR PPG at Bentley
USHL 2013-14
0.30
actual FR PPG at Bentley

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Boston · 2016-17
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2008-09
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.