← New Search ↗ Social Card

Levi Eiter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-04-25 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Bentley
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Prior Lake USHS-MN 30 5 9 14 0.467 0.0591 0.0591 0.1133 0.1133
2022-23 Prior Lake USHS-MN 26 5 12 17 0.654 0.0828 0.0828 0.1587 0.1587
2023-24 Prior Lake USHS-MN 26 16 8 24 0.923 0.1169 0.1169 0.2241 0.2241
2024-25 Prior Lake USHS-MN 26 21 17 38 1.462 0.1850 0.1850 0.3549 0.3549
2025-26 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 53 9 22 31 0.585 0.2254 0.2228 0.8507 0.8410
2026-27 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 6 2 6 8 1.333 0.5137 0.5137 1.9392 1.9392
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18241
Forward overall
#778
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

Bentley Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NAHL 2021-22
0.69
actual FR PPG at Bentley
BCHL 2016-17
0.86
actual FR PPG at Bentley
BCHL 2016-17
0.00
actual FR PPG at Bentley
BCHL 2012-13
0.70
actual FR PPG at Bentley

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stout · 2022-23
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2006-07
1.267 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Chatham · 2021-22
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.