IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brady Logue Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-12-14 Country: USA
Merrimack
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 48 9 11 20 0.417 0.1606 0.1719 0.6060 0.6487
2026-27 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 6 1 1 2 0.333 0.1284 0.1284 0.4848 0.4848
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#36353
Forward overall
#1459
Forward born in 2007
#2109
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Austin Vieth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Lappin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG

Merrimack Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

David Sacco
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.11
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
Conor Lovett
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.33
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
Laine McKay
OJHL 2015-16
0.21
actual FR PPG at Merrimack
Liam Walsh
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.33
actual FR PPG at Merrimack

D2/3 Comparables

Tye Battipaglia
Fitchburg State · 2023-24
1.160 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Santino DiNubile
Neumann · 2022-23
1.200 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Payton Kender
Rivier · 2023-24
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.