IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andreas Mikrogiannakis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-08-18 Country: Canada
RIT
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Aurora Tigers OJHL 43 13 13 26 0.605 0.1482 0.1597 0.4163 0.4487
2025-26 — BCHL 41 5 12 17 0.415 0.1597 0.1684 0.6034 0.6361
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#34153
Forward overall
#1290
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Gage Torrel
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Adam Johnson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
Nate Arentz
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Aston-Reese
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG

RIT Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Caleb Elfering
BCHL 2022-23
0.42
actual FR PPG at RIT
Abbott Girduckis
OJHL 2013-14
0.26
actual FR PPG at RIT
Erik Brown
CCHL 2013-14
0.46
actual FR PPG at RIT
Myles Powell
BCHL 2012-13
0.28
actual FR PPG at RIT

D2/3 Comparables

Lucas Culhane
Neumann · 2021-22
1.042 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Colby Nichol
Augsburg · 2002-03
0.850 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Landry Schmuck
Aurora · 2021-22
1.571 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.