← New Search ↗ Social Card

Duncan Thompson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-09-21 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Sacred Heart
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Berkshire School NE-Prep 32 25 19 44 1.375 0.2724 0.2724 0.6264 0.6264
2024-25 Berkshire School NE-Prep 33 17 33 50 1.515 0.3002 0.3002 0.6903 0.6903
2025-26 BCHL 47 10 6 16 0.340 0.1312 0.1324 0.4954 0.4998
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17461
Forward overall
#731
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Sacred Heart Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2019-20
0.38
actual FR PPG at Sacred Heart
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.27
actual FR PPG at Sacred Heart
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.17
actual FR PPG at Sacred Heart
BCHL 2016-17
0.57
actual FR PPG at Sacred Heart

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2022-23
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2017-18
0.679 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2021-22
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.