← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eric Lund Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-09-15 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Northeastern
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Cushing Academy NE-Prep 32 5 4 9 0.281 0.0565 0.0565 0.1286 0.1286
2024-25 Cushing Academy NE-Prep 30 14 10 24 0.800 0.1609 0.1609 0.3658 0.3658
2025-26 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 54 7 9 16 0.296 0.1142 0.1151 0.4309 0.4344
2026-27 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 5 2 2 4 0.800 0.2939 0.2881 0.8455 0.8288
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#38885
Forward overall
#2258
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Northeastern Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2022-23
0.46
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.15
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
USHL 2024-25
0.15
actual FR PPG at Northeastern

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2010-11
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2013-14
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2017-18
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.