IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Max Davidson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-05-24 Country: Canada
Clarkson
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 51 3 19 22 0.431 0.1057 0.1127 0.2969 0.3165
2025-26 — BCHL 46 4 5 9 0.196 0.0754 0.0786 0.2846 0.2967
2026-27 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 6 0 1 1 0.167 0.0642 0.0642 0.2424 0.2424
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17984
Defenseman overall
#2288
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Clarkson Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Tristan Sarsland
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.19
actual FR PPG at Clarkson
Carter Rose
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.07
actual FR PPG at Clarkson
Caden Lewandowski
USHL 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Clarkson
Cameron Ginnetti
USHL 2017-18
0.00
actual FR PPG at Clarkson

D2/3 Comparables

Chris Taff
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2013-14
0.867 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor Poirier
Hobart · 2013-14
0.368 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Troy Quinn
Wisconsin-Superior · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.