IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Max Davidson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-05-24 Country: Canada
Clarkson
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 51 3 19 22 0.431 0.1057 0.1127 0.2970 0.3166
2025-26 — BCHL 46 4 5 9 0.196 0.0754 0.0786 0.2848 0.2969
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
60%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17752
Defenseman overall
#2237
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Josh McArdle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Brown (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Scott Moldenhauer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Chris Buchanan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Bentley (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dane Cooper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Brown (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Maller
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Clarkson Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Carter Rose
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.07
actual FR PPG at Clarkson
Tristan Sarsland
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.19
actual FR PPG at Clarkson
William-Charles Bishop
QMJHL 2022-23
0.16
actual FR PPG at Clarkson
Michael Underwood
NAHL 2016-17
0.16
actual FR PPG at Clarkson

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Fitzgibbons
Utica · 2007-08
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nikita Sobolev
New England College · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Riley Meyer
Hamline · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.