← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cole Crusberg-Roseen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-04-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs NCDC 8 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 13 1 6 7 0.538 0.3003 0.3003 0.4354 0.4354
2021-22 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 60 20 15 35 0.583 0.2311 0.2289 0.6124 0.6066
2022-23 Lincoln Stars USHL 56 7 14 21 0.375 0.2305 0.2069 1.1048 0.9918
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Western Michigan D1 NCHC GR 18 0 7 7 0.389
2024-25 Western Michigan D1 NCHC SR 42 3 9 12 0.286
2023-24 Western Michigan D1 NCHC JR 22 0 3 3 0.136
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2023-24 · Western Michigan
-33.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4485
Defenseman overall
#1177
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Western Connecticut · 2024-25
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2003-04
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2014-15
1.143 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.