← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cole Crusberg-Roseen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-04-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs NCDC 8 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 13 1 6 7 0.538 0.2195 0.2195 0.4328 0.4328
2021-22 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 60 20 15 35 0.583 0.2143 0.2123 0.6157 0.6098
2022-23 Lincoln Stars USHL 56 7 14 21 0.375 0.2212 0.1986 1.1263 1.0111
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Western Michigan D1 NCHC GR 18 0 7 7 0.389
2024-25 Western Michigan D1 NCHC SR 42 3 9 12 0.286
2023-24 Western Michigan D1 NCHC JR 22 0 3 3 0.136
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2023-24 · Western Michigan
-29.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4420
Defenseman overall
#1123
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2007-08
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Trine · 2018-19
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2010-11
0.968 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.