IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Jung Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-02-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 60 7 10 17 0.283 0.0950 0.0912 0.2622 0.2518
2008-09 Battlefords North Stars SJHL 47 5 17 22 0.468 0.1199 0.1108 0.3529 0.3262
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SR 26 3 3 6 0.231
2011-12 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC JR 13 0 4 4 0.308
2010-11 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SO 27 0 7 7 0.259
2009-10 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC FR 19 3 4 7 0.368
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2009-10 · Fredonia
+318.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#35577
Forward overall
#1206
Forward born in 1988
#1238
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sebastian Hamming
Hamilton · 2023-24
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Taeron Lewis
Norwich · 2015-16
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Gori
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2003-04
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.