IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Reynolds Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-01-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2008-09 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 60 22 26 48 0.800 0.2672 0.2703 0.7426 0.7512
2009-10 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 48 19 20 39 0.812 0.2714 0.2607 0.7542 0.7244
2010-11 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 49 38 40 78 1.592 0.5317 0.4828 1.4777 1.3417
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SR 18 1 6 7 0.389
2012-13 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SO 34 9 11 20 0.588
2011-12 Vermont D1 HockeyEast FR 32 10 13 23 0.719
2002-03 Massachusetts College D3 — FR 20 3 0 3 0.150

NCAAe Rankings

#5786
Forward overall
#253
Forward born in 1990
#115
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Trevor Mingoia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kelly Wosnack
St. Norbert · 2001-02
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
A.J. Shiverdecker
Westfield State · 2007-08
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Trent Flory
Utica · 2000-01
0.920 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.