IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Grayden Slipec Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-03-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Surrey Eagles BCHL 54 18 19 37 0.685 0.2640 0.2940 0.9972 1.1105
2022-23 Chicago Steel USHL 52 4 9 13 0.250 0.1475 0.1538 0.7509 0.7827
2023-24 Chicago Steel USHL 53 2 8 10 0.189 0.1113 0.1105 0.5667 0.5626
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Northern Michigan D1 CCHA SO 21 1 6 7 0.333
2024-25 Northern Michigan D1 CCHA — 32 10 9 19 0.594
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.59
2024-25 · Northern Michigan
+442.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#35149
Forward overall
#2153
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Jordan Boucher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Parrottino
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ben Storm
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan McMurphy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
Brad Hawkinson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Blake Johnson
Concordia · 2020-21
0.389 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Rubino
Williams · 2007-08
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dennis Davidson
Tufts · 2022-23
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.