← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Kruper Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-01-19 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Sherwood Park Crusaders AJHL 4 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 Sherwood Park Crusaders AJHL 51 4 1 5 0.098 0.0329 0.0348 0.0907 0.0960
2013-14 Sherwood Park Crusaders AJHL 53 12 8 20 0.377 0.1266 0.1274 0.3492 0.3513
2014-15 Sherwood Park Crusaders AJHL 59 17 21 38 0.644 0.2160 0.2058 0.5961 0.5680
2015-16 Sherwood Park Crusaders AJHL 60 30 49 79 1.317 0.4416 0.4003 1.2185 1.1045
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 RIT D1 AHA SR 26 3 2 5 0.192
2018-19 RIT D1 AHA JR 32 3 2 5 0.156
2017-18 RIT D1 AHA SO 30 3 5 8 0.267
2016-17 RIT D1 AHA FR 26 7 9 16 0.615
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2016-17 · RIT
+122.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16654
Forward overall
#634
Forward born in 1995
#330
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Southern New Hampshire · 2018-19
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2010-11
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bowdoin · 2024-25
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.