| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Sherwood Park Crusaders | AJHL | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2012-13 | Sherwood Park Crusaders | AJHL | 51 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 0.098 | 0.0329 | 0.0348 | 0.0907 | 0.0960 |
| 2013-14 | Sherwood Park Crusaders | AJHL | 53 | 12 | 8 | 20 | 0.377 | 0.1266 | 0.1274 | 0.3492 | 0.3513 |
| 2014-15 | Sherwood Park Crusaders | AJHL | 59 | 17 | 21 | 38 | 0.644 | 0.2160 | 0.2058 | 0.5961 | 0.5680 |
| 2015-16 | Sherwood Park Crusaders | AJHL | 60 | 30 | 49 | 79 | 1.317 | 0.4416 | 0.4003 | 1.2185 | 1.1045 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | RIT | D1 | AHA | SR | 26 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 0.192 |
| 2018-19 | RIT | D1 | AHA | JR | 32 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 0.156 |
| 2017-18 | RIT | D1 | AHA | SO | 30 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 0.267 |
| 2016-17 | RIT | D1 | AHA | FR | 26 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 0.615 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.