← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brady Arneson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-02-11 Country: USA
Air Force
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Chicago Steel USHL 39 2 3 5 0.128 0.0756 0.0786 0.3850 0.4001
2023-24 Chicago Steel USHL 19 4 0 4 0.210 0.1242 0.1229 0.6322 0.6256
2024-25 Fargo Force USHL 55 6 11 17 0.309 0.1823 0.1711 0.9284 0.8714
2025-26 Omaha Lancers USHL 50 10 7 17 0.340 0.2006 0.1786 1.0212 0.9092
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
35%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30765
Forward overall
#1821
Forward born in 2005
#2874
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Air Force Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Air Force
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.29
actual FR PPG at Air Force
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.21
actual FR PPG at Air Force
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Air Force

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2017-18
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Framingham State · 2016-17
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2023-24
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.