← New Search ↗ Social Card

Harper Searles Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-09-24 Country: USA
Air Force
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Centennial USHS-MN 15 6 5 11 0.733 0.0928 0.0928 0.1781 0.1781
2021-22 Centennial USHS-MN 27 18 26 44 1.630 0.2063 0.2063 0.3958 0.3958
2022-23 Centennial USHS-MN 27 19 42 61 2.259 0.2860 0.2860 0.5488 0.5488
2023-24 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 27 5 11 16 0.593 0.2177 0.2320 0.6255 0.6667
2024-25 Madison Capitols USHL 35 0 3 3 0.086 0.0506 0.0491 0.2574 0.2495
2025-26 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 62 5 6 11 0.177 0.1046 0.0963 0.5328 0.4908
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#42592
Forward overall
#2751
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Air Force Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2021-22
0.21
actual FR PPG at Air Force
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.33
actual FR PPG at Air Force
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.29
actual FR PPG at Air Force
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.21
actual FR PPG at Air Force

D2/3 Comparables

Bethel · 2017-18
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamline · 2016-17
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2021-22
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.