IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jonah Henderson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-11-18 Country: USA
Albertus Magnus
UCHC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0671 0.0733 0.1851 0.2023
2019-20 Flin Flon Bombers SJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Tyler Sheehy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Alec Marsh
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Penn State (0.57 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jack Billings
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Niagara
0.16 No data
NCAAe PPG
Blake Christensen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ American International (0.64 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jared Fiegl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Cornell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Albertus Magnus Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Justin Sullivan
0.67
actual FR PPG at Albertus Magnus
Jack DeMoura
0.32
actual FR PPG at Albertus Magnus
Bailey Kirwin
0.33
actual FR PPG at Albertus Magnus
Cody Walker
0.40
actual FR PPG at Albertus Magnus

D2/3 Comparables

Drake Barnish
Utica · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Galvin
Wilkes · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Liam Freeborn
Adrian · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.