← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jason Davenport Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-06-29 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Northern Michigan
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Leamington Flyers OJHL 53 4 12 16 0.302 0.0740 0.0794 0.2079 0.2230
2024-25 BCHL 53 5 8 13 0.245 0.0945 0.0977 0.3570 0.3692
2025-26 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 59 2 12 14 0.237 0.1400 0.1343 0.7127 0.6836
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14794
Defenseman overall
#2657
Defenseman born in 2006
#3682
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Northern Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan
NAHL 2015-16
0.14
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan
BCHL 2022-23
0.26
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan
AJHL 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Northern Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2012-13
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2009-10
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2023-24
1.031 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.