← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nate Porter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-03-10 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Army
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Dexter NE-Prep 25 2 2 4 0.160 0.0322 0.0322 0.0732 0.0732
2022-23 Dexter NE-Prep 31 4 5 9 0.290 0.0584 0.0584 — —
2023-24 Madison Capitols USHL 7 0 1 1 0.143 0.0843 0.0879 0.4288 0.4473
2025-26 Okotoks Oilers BCHL 48 5 9 14 0.292 0.1124 0.1104 0.4242 0.4167
2026-27 Northeast Generals NAHL 7 2 3 5 0.714 0.2624 0.2504 0.7549 0.7205
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#50363
Forward overall
#3257
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

Army Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2019-20
0.25
actual FR PPG at Army
NAHL 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at Army
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Army
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.63
actual FR PPG at Army

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2011-12
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2018-19
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2012-13
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.