← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nate Porter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-03-10 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Army
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Dexter NE-Prep 25 2 2 4 0.160 0.0317 0.0317 0.0729 0.0729
2022-23 Dexter NE-Prep 31 4 5 9 0.290 0.0575 0.0575
2023-24 Madison Capitols USHL 7 0 1 1 0.143 0.0843 0.0879 0.4292 0.4478
2025-26 Okotoks Oilers BCHL 48 5 9 14 0.292 0.1124 0.1104 0.4245 0.4170
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#49829
Forward overall
#3233
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Army Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NAHL 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Army
NAHL 2013-14
0.17
actual FR PPG at Army
USHL 2019-20
0.27
actual FR PPG at Army
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.32
actual FR PPG at Army

D2/3 Comparables

Hobart · 2005-06
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2007-08
0.621 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.