← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carson Dyck Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-06-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 56 7 21 28 0.500 0.1677 0.1798 0.4627 0.4960
2019-20 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 43 5 24 29 0.674 0.2262 0.2262 0.6241 0.6241
2020-21 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 8 3 6 9 1.125 0.3773 0.3773 1.0411 1.0411
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Penn State D1 BigTen SR 28 1 2 3 0.107
2023-24 Penn State D1 BigTen JR 30 0 2 2 0.067
2022-23 Penn State D1 BigTen SO 2 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Penn State D1 BigTen FR 29 1 10 11 0.379
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2021-22 · Penn State
+146.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
75%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28524
Forward overall
#1485
Forward born in 2001
#861
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Army (0.62 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Canisius (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Bentley (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Penn State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alvernia · 2017-18
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2017-18
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Gustavus Adolphus · 2014-15
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.