IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cameron Vassos Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-09-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Aurora Tigers OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2019-20 Collingwood Blues OJHL 41 4 6 10 0.244 0.0598 0.0598 0.1679 0.1679
2020-21 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 13 1 0 1 0.077 0.0258 0.0258 0.0712 0.0712
2021-22 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 60 4 15 19 0.317 0.1062 0.1051 0.2931 0.2900
2022-23 Navan Grads CCHL 45 3 10 13 0.289 0.0627 0.0591 0.2235 0.2108
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Manhattanville D3 UCHC GR 24 2 2 4 0.167
2024-25 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SR 26 1 3 4 0.154
2023-24 Manhattanville D3 UCHC JR 7 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20263
Defenseman overall
#3315
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Barton
Skidmore · 2015-16
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Shawn Courtney
Adrian · 2008-09
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Aidan O'Connell
Stevenson · 2023-24
0.150 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.