IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tom Leppä Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-07-31 Country: Finland
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Jokerit U20 SM-Liiga-Jr 37 5 19 24 0.649 0.3515 0.4004 0.9809 1.1173
2022-23 Jokerit U20 SM-Liiga-Jr 45 19 12 31 0.689 0.3734 0.4092 1.0418 1.1416
2023-24 Fargo Force USHL 60 10 13 23 0.383 0.2261 0.2290 1.1512 1.1661
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Michigan Tech D1 CCHA — 39 6 13 19 0.487
2024-25 Michigan Tech D1 CCHA — 16 2 3 5 0.312
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2024-25 · Michigan Tech
+21.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

65%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15609
Forward overall
#806
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Nate Arentz
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Aston-Reese
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
Max Shuart
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Michigan
0.25 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jarrid Privitera
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Vermont (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Adam Johnson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Craig Levey
Hobart · 2000-01
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Fiume
Neumann · 2001-02
1.040 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Caden Triggs
Concordia · 2019-20
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.