IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Breken Northgrave Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-04-28 Country: USA
Chatham
UCHC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Drayton Valley Thunder AJHL 52 5 7 12 0.231 0.0774 0.0786 0.2136 0.2169
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21113
Defenseman overall
#2562
Defenseman born in 2007
#2284
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Chris Buchanan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Bentley (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Josh McArdle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Brown (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dane Cooper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Brown (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Justin Wade
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.10 No data
NCAAe PPG
Phil Boje
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Chatham Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Danny Cangelosi
0.23
actual FR PPG at Chatham
Caden Pendo
1.04
actual FR PPG at Chatham
Brock Forrest
0.57
actual FR PPG at Chatham
Chris Dusek
0.43
actual FR PPG at Chatham

D2/3 Comparables

Stewart Bell
Tufts · 2010-11
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jon Brumwell
Marian · 2012-13
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott Moyer
Bethel · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.