IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Filip Nordberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-03-05 Country: Sweden
2022 · Round 2, Pick #64  ·  Ottawa Senators Ottawa Senators
Signed Professionally
Allsvenskan

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 — SuperElit 42 6 21 27 0.643 0.2537 0.2627 0.8731 0.9039
2022-23 — SHL-J20 18 3 8 11 0.611 0.3396 0.3352 0.8142 0.8036
2023-24 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 52 1 13 14 0.269 0.1588 0.1497 0.8085 0.7621
2024-25 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 55 6 18 24 0.436 0.2574 0.2295 1.3107 1.1687
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast FR 38 0 7 7 0.184
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2025-26 · Merrimack
-1.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

62%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4500
Defenseman overall
#1153
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Galati
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
1.241 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brady Fleurent
University of New England · 2014-15
1.074 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jared Docking
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2008-09
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.