IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Schweitzer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-04-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 40 7 7 14 0.350 0.0897 0.0922 0.2638 0.2712
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Alabama ACHA_D1 — — 22 1 2 3 0.136
2024-25 University of Alabama ACHA_D1 — — 22 1 2 3 0.136
2023-24 University of Alabama ACHA_D1 — — 22 1 2 3 0.136
2022-23 University of Alabama ACHA_D1 — — 22 1 2 3 0.136
2021-22 University of Alabama ACHA_D1 — — 22 1 2 3 0.136
2020-21 University of Alabama ACHA_D1 — — 22 1 2 3 0.136
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2020-21 · University of Alabama
+72.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#45486
Forward overall
#1297
Forward born in 1984
#1348
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Ryan McMurphy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Storm
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Parrottino
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brad Hawkinson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Boucher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kyle Tomaso
Trinity · 2019-20
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Peyton Militello
Tufts · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Kasen Sauer
Saint John's · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.