← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Kuntz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-06-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Weyburn Red Wings SJHL 17 1 4 5 0.294 0.0850 0.0883 0.2214 0.2301
2003-04 Weyburn Red Wings SJHL 53 21 11 32 0.604 0.1744 0.1729 0.4545 0.4507
2004-05 Weyburn Red Wings SJHL 47 7 17 24 0.511 0.1475 0.1390 0.3844 0.3623
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Wisconsin-Superior D3 SR 29 4 10 14 0.483
2007-08 Wisconsin-Superior D3 JR 21 2 1 3 0.143
2006-07 Wisconsin-Superior D3 SO 15 1 2 3 0.200
2005-06 Wisconsin-Superior D3 FR 25 1 6 7 0.280
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2005-06 · Wisconsin-Superior
+114.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#29110
Forward overall
#978
Forward born in 1984
#1075
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England College · 2006-07
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Becker · 2009-10
0.467 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2015-16
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.