← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Kuntz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-06-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Weyburn Red Wings SJHL 17 1 4 5 0.294 0.0753 0.0783 0.2217 0.2304
2003-04 Weyburn Red Wings SJHL 53 21 11 32 0.604 0.1547 0.1534 0.4551 0.4513
2004-05 Weyburn Red Wings SJHL 47 7 17 24 0.511 0.1308 0.1233 0.3849 0.3628
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SR 29 4 10 14 0.483
2007-08 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC JR 21 2 1 3 0.143
2006-07 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SO 15 1 2 3 0.200
2005-06 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC FR 25 1 6 7 0.280
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2005-06 · Wisconsin-Superior
+141.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#36898
Forward overall
#1070
Forward born in 1984
#875
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Stevenson · 2018-19
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamline · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
King's · 2023-24
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.