← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trey Jefferis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-07-29 Country: USA
Northeastern
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 25 5 3 8 0.320 0.1888 0.1912 0.9602 0.9723
2024-25 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 47 14 19 33 0.702 0.4142 0.3983 2.1068 2.0258
2025-26 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 55 27 24 51 0.927 0.5470 0.4996 2.7825 2.5412
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2026-27 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

85%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7725
Forward overall
#279
Forward born in 2005
#674
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.48 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Northeastern Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NAHL 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
USHL 2016-17
0.17
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
USHL 2015-16
0.14
actual FR PPG at Northeastern
USHL 2012-13
1.05
actual FR PPG at Northeastern

D2/3 Comparables

Aurora · 2013-14
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Fitchburg State · 2016-17
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2021-22
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.