IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Munroe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-07-06 Country: USA
Maine
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Avon Old Farms NE-Prep 28 7 7 14 0.500 0.0990 0.0990 0.2278 0.2278
2023-24 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 8 2 0 2 0.250 0.1475 0.1636 0.7509 0.8331
2024-25 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 23 1 3 4 0.174 0.1026 0.1086 0.5223 0.5528
2025-26 — BCHL 55 19 11 30 0.545 0.2102 0.2204 0.7939 0.8323
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#38782
Forward overall
#1588
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Nate Arentz
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Adam Johnson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
Max Shuart
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Michigan
0.25 No data
NCAAe PPG
Alex Rauter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Cornell (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Nikolas Olsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Boston University (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average
NCAAe PPG

Maine Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Thomas Pichette
BCHL 2021-22
0.26
actual FR PPG at Maine
Justin Rai
BCHL 2012-13
0.08
actual FR PPG at Maine
Thomas Freel
CCHL 2019-20
0.42
actual FR PPG at Maine
Tristan Poissant
CCHL 2018-19
0.21
actual FR PPG at Maine

D2/3 Comparables

Jered Stevenson
Lebanon Valley · 2017-18
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Barkley
Neumann · 2021-22
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mac Lowry
Stevenson · 2017-18
1.062 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.