← New Search ↗ Social Card

Teddy Mutryn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-02-16 Country: USA
2025 · Round 3, Pick #95  ·  San Jose Sharks San Jose Sharks
Boston College
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 St. Sebastian’s NE-Prep 24 10 11 21 0.875 0.1733 0.1733 0.3987 0.3987
2022-23 St. Sebastian’s NE-Prep 24 5 19 24 1.000 0.1981 0.1981 0.4556 0.4556
2023-24 NTDP-U18 5 1 0 1 0.200 0.1487 0.1507 0.7463 0.7565
2024-25 Chicago Steel USHL 51 18 14 32 0.627 0.3702 0.3847 1.8846 1.9584
2025-26 Moncton Wildcats QMJHL 54 31 37 68 1.259 0.6187 0.6164 3.3627 3.3504
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
92%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7936
Forward overall
#158
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 1.09 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.64 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.11 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.80 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UMass
0.58 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Marian (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Boston College Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

SuperElit 2021-22
0.50
actual FR PPG at Boston College
OHL 2015-16
0.60
actual FR PPG at Boston College
USHL 2019-20
0.43
actual FR PPG at Boston College
USHL 2017-18
0.21
actual FR PPG at Boston College

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.