IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Buzzeo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-01-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Humboldt Broncos SJHL 54 20 33 53 0.982 0.2515 0.2451 0.7399 0.7209
2010-11 — SJHL 51 31 51 82 1.608 0.4119 0.3808 1.2120 1.1204
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Ferris State D1 WCHA SR 40 9 13 22 0.550
2013-14 Ferris State D1 WCHA JR 42 14 18 32 0.762
2012-13 Ferris State D1 CCHA SO 28 5 8 13 0.464
2011-12 Ferris State D1 CCHA FR 12 1 0 1 0.083
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2011-12 · Ferris State
-70.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8731
Forward overall
#367
Forward born in 1990
#15
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Mingoia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

John Moncovich
Utica · 2018-19
0.864 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Carlson
Wilkes · 2021-22
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
John Scorcia
Salve Regina · 2010-11
1.160 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.