← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Genovese Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-02-09 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Quinnipiac
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 49 6 6 12 0.245 0.0900 0.0929 0.2588 0.2672
2025-26 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 54 12 26 38 0.704 0.2585 0.2541 0.7437 0.7312
2026-27 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 8 2 0 2 0.250 0.0919 0.0873 0.2642 0.2511
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27731
Forward overall
#1394
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

Quinnipiac Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2018-19
0.20
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.14
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
NAHL 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac

D2/3 Comparables

Skidmore · 2018-19
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tufts · 2016-17
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bowdoin · 2015-16
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.