← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Genovese Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-02-09 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Quinnipiac
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 49 6 6 12 0.245 0.0900 0.0929 0.2585 0.2669
2025-26 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 54 12 26 38 0.704 0.2585 0.2541 0.7428 0.7303
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27263
Forward overall
#1365
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Quinnipiac Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

BCHL 2016-17
0.00
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.67
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
USPHL-Premier-Classic 2016-17
0.00
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
NAHL 2016-17
0.00
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stout · 2018-19
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Potsdam · 2005-06
0.647 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lawrence · 2017-18
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.