← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cam Springer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-05-24 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Bowling Green
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Chippewa Steel NAHL 35 9 9 18 0.514 0.1890 0.2077
2024-25 Tri-City Storm USHL 62 9 10 19 0.306 0.1808 0.1813 0.9205 0.9228
2025-26 Tri-City Storm USHL 61 11 14 25 0.410 0.2417 0.2306 1.2308 1.1744
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25244
Forward overall
#1229
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Bowling Green Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2015-16
0.24
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
USHL 2016-17
0.24
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
SJHL 2018-19
0.19
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
OHL 2016-17
0.13
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2022-23
0.588 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2017-18
1.103 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2017-18
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.