IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jaden Johnson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-04-28 Country: USA
Aurora
NCHA D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Janesville Jets NAHL 39 2 8 10 0.256 0.0942 0.1030 0.2706 0.2959
2023-24 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 44 9 16 25 0.568 0.2088 0.2183 — —
2024-25 New Hampshire Mountain Kings NAHL 55 13 28 41 0.746 0.2739 0.2720 0.7869 0.7814
2025-26 New Hampshire Mountain Kings NAHL 33 11 17 28 0.849 0.3117 0.2942 0.8956 0.8453
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19148
Forward overall
#1022
Forward born in 2005
#1202
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

Aurora Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Mike Mikulan
0.82
actual FR PPG at Aurora
Hassan Akl
0.93
actual FR PPG at Aurora
Landry Schmuck
1.57
actual FR PPG at Aurora
Adam Keyes
1.26
actual FR PPG at Aurora

D2/3 Comparables

Brad Carpenter
Wentworth · 2000-01
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Owen Sikich
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2017-18
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Prappas
Trine · 2018-19
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.